How to Build Incentive Packages That Attract and Motivate Corporate Venture Co-Founders to Succeed

Discover the five key components you can use to build tailored incentivisation packages that attract top entrepreneurial talent and boost your chances of venture success.

Building successful ventures is no easy feat, no matter what growth stage you’re in. However, many experienced entrepreneurs agree that the really hard part comes post-validation, after the pilot, when it's time to launch and scale (i.e. the growth stage). 

It’s at this point that you’ll need to find the right co-founder profile to take your corporate venture to scale and beyond. These profiles are entrepreneurially minded, visionary, open to risk and comfortable with uncertainty—traits not common in internal profiles. So, how do you attract and motivate the entrepreneurial profiles you need? 

Short answer: It's all about the incentives. 

It takes more than just a competitive salary to attract the right entrepreneurial profiles and keep them truly motivated. You'll need to build a tailored incentivisation package that aligns with the interests of the co-founder and the corporation while also supporting the sustainable growth and success of your corporate venture.

To help guide you through the process, we’ve highlighted five key components you can use to build customised incentivisation packages that meet the goals of your co-founder, venture and parent company. Think of these five components as building blocks you can mix and match to create an effective incentive package that drives your co-founder to succeed.

Let’s dive in.

Key component 1. Base compensation

Base compensation provides the essential financial security needed to attract and retain co-founders, serving as the backbone of broader incentive strategies. Models in this category include:

Employee contracts: Traditional employment agreements offering salary and standard corporate benefits.

Pros

  • Offers higher stability and security compared to other employment structures.
  • Allows reliance on a stable workforce, which is critical in scaling operations effectively.

Cons

  • Higher overhead costs.
  • Labour laws may limit the flexibility.

Employee benefits: Added perks, including holidays, training stipends, and pension contributions that enhance the company’s attractiveness and support staff well-being.

Pros

  • Creates a thriving work environment.

Cons

  • Adds overhead costs.
  • May attract co-founders for the wrong reasons.

Management or entrepreneur-in-residence contract: A flexible and often temporary contract designed for C-level and entrepreneurial profiles, focusing on innovation and business development.

Pros

  • Attracts highly sought talent.
  • Can be structured more flexibly (e.g., compensation, non-compete, termination).

Cons

  • Can be a temporary role.
  • Requires defined roles and responsibilities.
  • Difficult to have “exclusivity”.

Key component 2. Deferred compensation

Deferred compensation aligns long-term interests by offering rewards based on future performance or milestones. Models in this category include:

Deferred salary/bonus: A portion of salary or bonus is held back and paid later, contingent upon achieving certain performance goals.

Pros

  • Creates future incentives and prevents early cash-outs.
  • Fosters loyalty and long-term commitment.

Cons

  • Co-founders must be able to influence KPIs directly.
  • May lead to significant future cash liabilities if paid in cash.

Phantom/virtual stock: Offers equity-like incentives without actual share issuance, calculated based on the company’s valuation and paid as cash bonuses.

Pros

  • Aligns long-term interests and motivates retention.
  • Lower upfront costs, payable only if the company’s value increases.

Cons

  • No actual equity ownership, which can be complex to understand.
  • May result in high cash liabilities over time, affecting liquidity.

Key component 3. Profit sharing

Profit sharing ties a portion of the compensation to the financial performance of the venture or the individual co-founder, directly aligning their rewards with the venture's success. Models in this category include:

Profit-based: Compensation that is directly linked to the venture's realised profits, paid out as soon as these profits are recorded.

Pros

  • Fosters ownership and motivation by directly linking pay to the venture's profitability.

Cons

  • Profit is not always a good overall performance indicator.
  • Profit-linked rewards can be costly and require accurate profit calculations.

Performance-based: Provides compensation based on achieving specific performance metrics rather than direct profit figures.

Pros

  • Encourages co-founders to exceed specific performance targets.

Cons

  • KPIs must be clear and influenceable by co-founders.
  • Focusing exclusively on KPIs may not fully capture overall venture health.

Pro-rata team compensation: Allocates compensation from a shared profit pool based on individual roles, duties, and contributions within the team.

Pros

  • Promotes equity and morale by fairly distributing rewards based on contribution.

Cons

  • As the team grows, this model becomes expensive and complex to manage.
  • May focus too much on short-term results, potentially overlooking long-term goals.

Key component 4. Equity incentivisation

Equity incentivisation provides co-founders with a direct stake in the venture’s success, aligning their financial outcomes with the venture's long-term strategy and performance. Models in this category include:

Share purchase: Allows co-founders to buy shares or co-invest alongside investors and the corporation.

Pros

  • Promotes long-term collaboration.
  • Increases attractiveness to investors.

Cons

  • Requires upfront investment from co-founders.
  • The exit strategy needs to be clear to ensure liquidity for the venture team.

Stock options: Offers the option to purchase shares at a predetermined price and timeframe, encouraging investment in the company's future.

Pros

  • Encourages ownership in the venture.
  • Often receives favourable tax treatment.

Cons

  • Administratively burdensome.
  • Complex if structured with corporate stock instead of venture stock.

Growth shares: Securities that provide payouts to co-founders based on achieving specific performance thresholds.

Pros

  • Highly adaptable to performance thresholds.
  • Focuses on long-term growth.

Cons

  • Complex for tax-efficient structuring.
  • Requires clear, objective KPIs.

Buy-backs and buy-outs: Options for the company to repurchase shares from co-founders once certain goals are achieved.

Pros

  • Provides liquidity even without a sale or spin-out.
  • Ideal for ventures closely tied to corporates.

Cons

  • It requires a clear, upfront view of exit strategies.
  • Share valuation principles can be complex.

Share swaps or stock options: Allows for the exchange of venture shares for corporate shares or options, linking the stability of the corporation with the venture's potential.

Pros

  • Links venture to corporate value, stabilising benefits.
  • Good for internal ventures or those lacking separate equity.

Cons

  • Venture valuation can be more complex than corporate valuation.
  • Incentives are no longer tied directly to venture success after the grant.

Key component 5. Non-financial incentivisation

Non-financial incentives offer additional ways to attract and retain co-founders beyond monetary compensation, focusing on recognition, work-life balance, autonomy, and significant roles within the venture.

Recognition & PR: Co-founders are credited as co-inventors on patents and are prominently featured in public documents.

Pros

  • Builds loyalty with co-founders.
  • Encourages innovation and long-term engagement.

Cons

  • Requires solid agreements to prevent financial claims.
  • Can backfire if negative exposure occurs.

Working conditions and arrangements: Includes flexible working options such as remote work, educational events, and competitive pay.

Pros

  • Fosters long-term engagement.
  • Boosts happiness and morale among co-founders.

Cons

  • May increase overhead costs.
  • Potential to influence other incentives negatively.

Autonomy: Co-founders have significant control over strategy and operations, including key areas like hiring and policy decisions.

Pros

  • Builds loyalty within venture teams.
  • Allows for self-organisation and ownership.

Cons

  • Potential conflicts between corporate and venture visions.
  • Risk of missed benefits if not properly managed.

Roles & Responsibilities: Involves assigning key roles in governance and board composition to co-founders.

Pros

  • Builds loyalty by providing significant influence over venture direction.

Cons

  • Can create tension if visions between corporate and venture management differ.

4 tips to help you build your incentive package

Here are a few tips to help you structure your incentivisation package in a way that is strategically aligned with both your venture and the type of talent you aim to attract:

Tip 1: Consider your exit strategy

Align co-founder incentives with the venture’s long-term exit strategy, whether it’s spinning in, spinning out, or other transitions. This ensures that incentives are tightly coupled with the corporate's vision its plans for the venture's future.

Tip 2: Make it good

Competition for top talent among corporates, startups, and high-tech companies is fierce. That’s why it's crucial to ensure your incentive packages are compelling enough to attract and retain experts and unique talent for the long haul.

Tip 3: Tailor your package to suit internal vs external founders

Recognise that internal and external candidates have different needs. Internal founders often prefer stable employment status, while external ones might favour flexible, entrepreneurial-in-residence type contracts that allow greater autonomy and quick impact.

Tip 4: Consider the venture type

For external ventures, leverage the ability to offer dynamic equity-based incentives like stocks, shares, and options. These are tied to the venture's capital structure and can be pivotal in attracting co-founders, even in the early stages of the venture.

Final thoughts

By thoughtfully combining these five key components and tailoring them to your specific scenario, you can create a package that not only attracts top talent but keeps them invested in your venture's long-term success. Remember, there's no one-size-fits-all solution. The key is to understand what drives your co-founders and align those drivers with your venture's objectives.

Want to know more about how you can use and combine different incentivisation models to attract the right talent, build dynamic partnerships with co-founders and boost your chances of venture success? Check out our report: 5 Components for Incentivising Corporate Venture Co-Founders.

___

Want to implement a tailored venturing strategy that delivers? We can help you leverage existing corporate assets to access new markets, technologies, and revenue streams at startup speed. 

Get access to the only corporate venture database in the world

Looking for insights and inspiration for your next venture track? See who's changing the game and explore this ever-expanding database.

What corporate venturing insights are you looking for?

Try searching for topics related to your challenge

Keep reading.

4 Examples of Successful Corporate Scaleups

4 Examples of Successful Corporate Scaleups

Get a tangible idea of what a successful corporate scaleup looks like with these examples.

The low-risk alternative for down payments that is paving the way to a sustainable future.

The low-risk alternative for down payments that is paving the way to a sustainable future.

Corporate Startup of the Week

Joint-Ventures Explained: Definition, Types and Real-World Examples

Joint-Ventures Explained: Definition, Types and Real-World Examples

Discover how joint-ventures can help you fuel growth, the different types and inspiring real-world examples of some of the most successful joint-ventures of all time.