Acquisition vs Alliance: How to Choose the Right Growth Strategy for Corporate-Startup Collaboration

What’s the difference between acquisitions and alliances?

Acquisitions and alliances are both used to drive corporate growth, but they differ in ownership, control, and risk:

• Acquisitions involve buying another business outright. 
• Alliances are partnerships where both companies remain legally independent.

Let’s explore how each model works.

What is an acquisition?

An acquisition occurs when a company takes control of another by purchasing a majority stake in its shares or assets. It’s a common way to:

• Build on existing strengths and capabilities
• Expand market reach and customer base
• Add new technologies, talent, or revenue streams

While often grouped with mergers under the umbrella of M&A, they’re not the same:

• In an acquisition, both entities continue to exist, with one becoming the parent company.
• In a merger, two or more companies combine into a single entity, either by absorbing one into another or creating a new company entirely.

Acquisitions can enable rapid capability growth, but they also carry risk. According to Harvard Business Review, 70 to 90% fail to deliver growth or innovation that meets expectations.   

What is a strategic alliance?

A strategic alliance is a collaboration between two companies that stay legally separate while working toward a common goal. These partnerships are often used by corporations to:

• Access new technologies or markets
• Test new business models
• Strengthen internal innovation culture
  

In most cases, alliances involve a large company teaming up with a startup or scale-up. Success depends on establishing a balanced, trust-based dynamic that allows both sides to contribute and learn.

What are the benefits and risks of corporate acquisitions?

Corporate acquisitions allow companies to grow rapidly by gaining full control of external businesses. When done strategically, M&A can expand capabilities, open new markets, and deliver better shareholder returns, especially for programmatic acquirers who pursue deals around a clear theme.

Let’s break down the key advantages and challenges of using acquisitions as a growth tool:

Benefits of corporate acquisitions

A competitive advantage

Merging with or buying out a possible competitor enables companies to absorb their capabilities and strengths instead of having to compete with them. Having a larger market share can also increase a company’s bargaining power with vendors and suppliers.

Decreased risk

Building new companies from scratch often involves risks related to regulatory compliance, the uncertainty of exploring a new market, building new supply chains and networks. Acquisitions decrease the risk by enabling companies to buy businesses that are already established. 

Speed

Developing a new venture from scratch can take years and a huge amount of effort. Acquisitions give companies quick access to new capabilities, talent, technology and business models and with reduced effort. 

An economy of scope and scale

Buying or merging with businesses that complement your company’s strengths can significantly reduce production costs, enhance an existing offering, provide access to a broader network and give you a competitive edge you didn't have before. It can enable you to streamline your operations through new technologies or business models, making you stronger, faster and more efficient. 

Strategic diversification

Acquiring or merging with companies outside your core business will enable you to diversify your products and services. This adds to your scale and capabilities and provides more sources of revenue. If one market dries out, you always have the others. 

Challenges of corporate acquisitions

The opposite of scale

One of the main benefits of M&A is to add companies that build on your strengths, complement your business and make you stronger. However, this can also backfire, making companies too large, difficult to manage and inefficient.  

The cost

M&A can be costly, involving not only the initial purchase of the company but the expenses that follow (e.g. for legal and accounting work). This can add up to millions making it hard for companies to get a return on investment. The long-term ROI can also be difficult to calculate, resulting in many companies paying more than their acquisition is worth.

Culture conflicts and distressed employees

Integrating two companies with conflicting cultures can be challenging and demotivating for employees. It often also results in the consolidation of departments, leading to employee cutbacks and lay-offs. Employees are well aware of this dynamic, which can lead to dissatisfaction, demotivation, stress and decreased productivity. 

What are the benefits and risks of strategic alliances?

Strategic alliances allow corporations to collaborate with startups without full ownership. These partnerships give both sides access to valuable assets, faster innovation, and flexible growth, making them a smart alternative to acquisitions in many cases.

Benefits of strategic alliances

Flexibility

In most cases, partnerships are easier to form, manage and run than acquisitions. They tend to be less regulated, giving both parties more flexibility as long as they’re aligned on their goals.

Access to valuable assets

Partnerships enable companies to pool their resources and reach growth goals more effectively than they would have on their own. Each partner brings strengths to the table:

• Corporates offer scale, brand reach, and resources
• Startups bring agility, innovation, and cutting-edge tech

Bringing these assets together enables both partners to get the best of both worlds

Intrapreneurship

Collaborating with startups can have a revitalising effect on a corporation’s culture, inspiring innovation, entrepreneurship and creativity. This can make companies more competitive, inspiring new ways to leverage corporate assets to deliver new growth and revenue sources.

For more intrapreneurship insights, check out our report: 20 Corporate Intrapreneurship Programs.

Speed

Partnerships provide access to new technologies, concepts and business models quicker than if they had to be developed internally from scratch.

Challenges of strategic alliances

A lack of alignment

. Challenges can arise due to unclear goals, unrealistic expectations or timeframes that might be unattainable. Maturity misalignment can also be a challenge (e.g. when a corporate partners with a startup on a solution it's not yet ready to implement). If unresolved, these challenges can hinder the innovation process and keep both partners from reaching their growth targets.

Managing experimentation

To succeed, alliances must embrace a test-and-learn mindset. Both partners need to accept failure as part of the process and be ready to pivot or exit when data calls for it.

Uneven decision-making power

If one partner—usually the corporate—dominates decision-making, it can slow down the innovation process and discourage the startup from taking necessary risks.

‍

🚨 Pro tip: When comparing acquisition vs alliance models, it’s crucial to align the choice with your company’s M&A strategy and long-term innovation goals.

FAQs about acquisitions vs alliances for corporate-startup collaboration

Q. What’s better for innovation, acquisition or alliance?

Strategic alliances are often better for innovation because they allow rapid experimentation, shared risk, and flexible exit options. Corporate acquisitions, while effective for scaling proven models, tend to involve more risk, higher costs, and slower integration.

Q. How can corporations ensure successful alliances with startups?

To succeed with corporate-startup alliances, set clear shared goals, maintain strong communication, and ensure both parties have decision-making power. Adopt lean experimentation methods and be prepared to pivot based on data.

Q. When should a company acquire a startup instead of partnering?

A company should consider acquiring a startup when it wants full ownership, fast access to technology or talent, or long-term strategic integration with its core business.

Q. Can a strategic alliance lead to a future acquisition?

Yes. Many corporations begin with a strategic partnership and later transition into a full startup acquisition once the collaboration proves successful. This de-risks the investment and ensures better cultural fit.

Q. Why are alliances better for early-stage innovation?

Alliances allow corporations to experiment with new technologies, test markets, and iterate fast, without committing large capital or disrupting core operations.

Q. What’s the main advantage of acquiring a startup?

The main advantage is speed. Acquisitions let companies gain proven tech, talent, or market share instantly, especially when there’s a clear strategic fit.

Q. What risks should corporate innovators watch out for in acquisitions?

Key risks include poor cultural fit, overvaluation, and post-acquisition integration failure. These can reduce ROI and disrupt internal operations.

When should you choose an acquisition vs an alliance?

The short answer? Choose acquisitions when scale, control, and speed are priorities. Opt for alliances when flexibility, shared risk, and experimentation are key.

Every venture is unique, each with its own requirements and potential for return, and because of that, there is no “one size fits all” approach to growth and success. In other words, while some ventures are better suited to be acquisitions, others are better as alliances. According to a study published in the Management International Review:

• Alliances provide strategic flexibility, shared risk and fast learning, making them a good option in cases of high environmental uncertainty and knowledge dispersion. 
• Acquisitions, on the other hand, are the better option in cases where there is less need for strategic flexibility and the goal is to promote economies of scale and scope. 

When choosing between the two, it’s also important to assess your specific capabilities as well as the speed with which you need to hit your growth goals. Once you know that, you can use the table below as a guide to help make your decision.

‍

‍

Knowing the advantages and challenges that come with each of these innovation strategies, as well as the conditions and capabilities that they’re best suited for, will help you make a more informed decision. Ultimately enabling you to choose the best fit for your organisation and its overall growth objectives. 

_____

Want to future-proof your company and create new revenue streams for the future? We can help you create a customised venture strategy that aligns with your corporate goals, culture, and assets while driving measurable growth.