8 Signs Your Corporate Venture Is Failing—And How to Save It (With Real Examples)

Sign 1. Lack of product-market fit (PMF)

The top reason for corporate venture failure? A product no one needs. Up to 42% of startups fail due to a lack of market demand, and corporate startups are no exception. No amount of brand power, capital, or internal buy-in can make up for missing product-market fit. If your venture doesn’t solve a real, urgent problem for a clearly defined audience, it won’t succeed.

Creating new markets is rare, and even when it is possible, timing is a factor. Just because a solution is innovative doesn’t mean customers are ready for it. To assess product-market fit for corporate ventures, track these core signals:

• User growth: Are people adopting your solution organically?
• User engagement: Are they using it regularly and meaningfully?
• User retention: Do they come back and stick with it?

Weak metrics here are a flashing red light. Without PMF, your corporate venture is likely burning time and resources.

Example: Walmart's Jetblack

Shut down: 2020

Why it failed: Weak PMF, low user growth, high subscription cost

Lesson: Even strong retail backing can’t fix a solution without clear demand

‍

Jetblack was one of Walmart’s bold corporate startup innovations—a $50 per month concierge shopping service targeting busy urban shoppers (e.g. parents). Users ordered products via text, with human assistants curating and handling requests. Despite Walmart’s scale and retail expertise, Jetblack never achieved product-market fit for corporates:

• Weak user growth: subscriber numbers remained far below expectations
• Low retention: customers didn’t see enough value to justify the high monthly fee
• Niche audience: The service catered to a small, affluent demographic, limiting scalability

While the concept aimed to deliver convenience, customers preferred faster, cheaper alternatives—like Amazon’s 1-click ordering. Without strong demand or engagement, Jetblack became a classic case of corporate venture failure, shutting down in 2020. 

Avoiding lack of product-market fit (PMF)

To avoid corporate venture failure, validate early and often. Test, refine, and co-create your solution with real users. If they’re excited, willing to pay, and stick around, you’re getting close to product-market fit. As explained by Marc Andreessen: 

“You can always feel when product/market fit isn’t happening… usage isn’t growing that fast, word of mouth isn’t spreading, press reviews are ‘blah,’ and sales cycles drag on.” 

Remember, PMF isn’t a box you check once. It shifts as your customers and market evolve. Stay proactive by asking:

• Are customers outside your personal network using (and paying for) it?
• Did they pay full price, or were they just testers?
• Is growth happening organically, or are you forcing it?

Think of product-market fit like a vital sign. Monitor it closely. Without it, your corporate venture won’t survive.

‍

Sign 2. High customer churn and poor retention

Acquiring users is only the first step. Keeping them is what really matters. Strong retention is one of the clearest indicators of product-market fit. As investor Andrew Chen explains it, "The opposite of PMF is low retention."

If users sign up, try your product once or twice, and then disappear, it’s a major red flag. High churn and poor engagement often signal that your solution isn’t solving a “must-have” problem or delivering enough value to become part of a user’s routine. In other words, if customers are ghosting you, something’s off.

Example: Meta’s Bulletin

Shutdown: 2022-2023

Why it failed: Low writer adoption, low engagement, lack of differentiation

Lesson: Big reach doesn’t equal product-market fit

In 2021, Meta (formerly Facebook) launched Bulletin, a newsletter platform meant to rival Substack and give writers a way to build direct audiences. Despite Meta’s massive reach and resources, this internal startup failed to attract or retain a meaningful user base—both in terms of writers and readers.

Writers had little incentive to leave more established platforms, and readers weren’t compelled to switch or follow newsletters on a separate ecosystem. With low engagement and no organic momentum, Meta announced the shutdown of Bulletin in 2022.

Avoiding high customer churn and poor retention

Corporate ventures should closely track user behavior to identify where drop-offs happen, then adjust the product, onboarding, or messaging to close those gaps. A few additional layers to consider include:

• Short-term lock-in: Can you create habits or incentives that keep early users around?
• Long-term retention: Are users still active after 12 months?

There are exceptions. For instance, HelloFresh operates with high churn but offsets it through efficient marketing, discounts and a steady stream of new customers (as well as re-hooked churned customers). In other models, long-term retention may be low, but the sheer size of the market and high organic acquisition can still make the venture viable. However, in most cases, high churn is a red flag. That’s why it’s essential to:

• Monitor user feedback and usage patterns
• Continuously refine onboarding, feature sets, and design
• Dig deeper to uncover and address any underlying product-market misalignments

‍

Sign 3. Flat or declining growth 

When key growth metrics like active users, revenue, or engagement plateau or decline over an extended period, it indicates that the venture isn't effectively addressing a compelling market need or is facing increased competition.​ 

However, it's essential to distinguish between stagnation due to market saturation and stagnation due to a lack of product-market fit. For instance, a product may experience flat growth in a saturated market but continue to grow in other regions. Recognising this difference is crucial. However, it’s important to distinguish between two causes of stagnation:

• Market saturation after PMF: Growth slows after reaching your core audience
• Stagnation without PMF: Weak demand or competition blocks early traction

If growth is flat because your corporate venture has successfully scaled within a limited market, it may be time to explore new regions or expand your product offering. But if PMF hasn’t been achieved, the problem runs deeper and requires rethinking your solution or positioning.

‍

Venture Club Story: A major tech corporation was testing simple UX research loop with U.S. customers revealed that their value prop, which worked well in Germany but fell flat in new markets. That one study helped justify the kill decision with clarity and speed.

Example: Amazon’s Amazon Care

Shutdown: 2022

Why it failed: Flat growth, limited market traction

Lesson: Validate early and consider partnerships/acquisitions to fill gaps

Amazon Care was a hybrid corporate venture offering virtual and in-person healthcare services for employees. While it had plans to scale nationwide, the service struggled to gain traction beyond its pilot market.

• The offer wasn’t complete enough for large enterprise customers, limiting expansion
• It couldn’t keep pace with competitors or navigate complex healthcare regulations
• Instead of pushing a flawed model, Amazon pivoted by acquiring One Medical in 2022

As a result, Amazon ended up discontinuing Amazon Care in 2022.

Avoiding flat or declining growth

Monitor key metrics like user acquisition cost, conversion rates, and customer lifetime value, not just to track progress but to identify early signs of stagnation. Ask yourself:

• Are we reaching the right audience?
• Are users willing to pay even before launch?
• Are they finding us organically, without heavy ad spend?

If the answer is no, your product or market positioning may need a rethink. Be honest about your market potential:

• Is the market large enough to sustain growth?
• If it’s saturated, can you realistically outperform competitors?
• Would at least 40% of your target audience be genuinely disappointed if your product disappeared tomorrow?

Growth is strongest when it happens organically. If you're relying too heavily on marketing to maintain momentum, it may be a sign that the underlying value proposition isn’t strong enough. There are exceptions, of course. Some ventures thrive with niche audiences, high-touch sales, or specialised marketing. However, those models should be deliberate and well-calculated from the start.

‍

Sign 4. Founder conflict or burnout

Startups don’t just fail because of market missteps or product issues—people problems can be equally fatal. According to Harvard Business School professor Noam Wasserman, 65% of high-potential startups fail due to conflict among the founding team.

In corporate venture settings, conflict doesn’t just happen between co-founders. Misalignment can also arise between the founding team and key internal stakeholders (e.g. corporate sponsors, steering committees, or executive boards). Whether it’s a clash in vision, values, timelines, or risk tolerance, these tensions can delay decisions, disrupt momentum, and lead to fractured execution. 

In addition, the emotional and physical toll of building a venture is real. Recent research by Sifted revealed that about 49% of founders have considered quitting, citing feelings of being “overworked, exhausted, and broken.” 

‍

Venture Club Insight: Each pivot costs time and money. And if you’re stuck in a loop of rethinking everything every quarter—it’s not a pivot anymore. It’s paralysis.

Example: Ford and Argo AI

Shutdown: 2020

Why it failed: Founder-investor misalignment, unclear go-to-market path

Lesson: No amount of funding can fix strategic misalignment

Launched in 2016 with significant investment from Ford (and later, Volkswagen), Argo AI set out to build self-driving technology for mainstream vehicles. Despite raising over $3.6 B and showing strong technical promise, Argo was abruptly shut down in 2022.

As the autonomous vehicle market cooled and economic pressures mounted, Ford publicly stated that Argo “didn’t deliver the breakthrough” needed. Reports suggested that there was a growing misalignment between Argo’s leadership and its investors, particularly on go-to-market timing, capital efficiency, and long-term profitability.

Avoiding founder conflict or burnout

Establish clear governance structures, transparent communication, and well-defined decision-making processes from the start. Assign dedicated roles and responsibilities to avoid overlap and confusion. Regular alignment on goals and milestones helps prevent strategic drift.

In corporate and studio-backed ventures, founder incentivisation is also key. Well-structured vesting plans and clear exit conditions help align long-term interests and reduce friction.

Finally, keep roles distinct: founders should lead the business, not dominate board dynamics or capital strategy.

‍

Sign 5. Funding dry-up and runway exhaustion

Cash is the lifeblood of any venture—internal startup or not. When funds run low and new capital is hard to secure, even promising ventures can stall. “Ran out of cash” is the second most common reason for startup failure, cited in nearly 29% of cases.

In a corporate context, you’re not pitching VCs; you’re pitching your CFO. Budgets are tied to performance, and internal sponsors expect measurable progress toward profitability. If you can’t show traction, your corporate venture may lose funding or be shut down.

Today’s economic climate has raised the bar. Many corporate startups are seeing tighter budgets, falling valuations, and slower internal investment cycles. 

‍

Venture Club Lesson: Don't be tempted by vanity metrics. The hard part is having a team and culture that calls it out early.

Example: Alphabet’s Loon

Shutdown: 2021

Why it failed: Lack of scalable business model, unclear path to profitability

Lesson: Without a solid business case, funding can run out fast

Launched by Alphabet’s Moonshot Factory, X, Loon aimed to deliver global Internet access using high-altitude balloons. Despite major technological breakthroughs and global pilots, the venture struggled to build a viable, scalable business model. In 2021, Alphabet shut Loon down, citing an inability to find “a long-term, sustainable business.”

This example shows that even well-funded ventures under big tech umbrellas aren’t immune. If the path to profitability remains unclear, support can vanish.

Avoiding funding dry-up and runway exhaustion

Set clear, measurable milestones (e.g., pilot success, early revenue, or user traction) that build confidence with internal sponsors. Back progress with data, and if growth stalls, show how you’re learning, pivoting, or adapting fast.

In the early stages, focus on strong leadership and a deep understanding of the customer. As your corporate startup grows, demonstrate how you’ll deliver ROI and over what timeline. Knowing your internal stakeholders’ expectations is just as critical as knowing your market.

In later stages, hard metrics and traction become the proof points that validate your early assumptions. That’s why it’s critical to map out your funding runway from the start. You’ll quickly understand why the saying goes, “As a founder, you’re always raising.”

‍

Sign 6. Unsustainable unit economics

Not all growth is good growth. A venture might be gaining users, revenue, or even market buzz, but if each sale loses money, that growth can be deceptive and dangerous. As investor David Sacks explains:

“Nothing will give a startup the illusion of success like negative unit economics. You can grow very quickly when you’re selling dollar bills for 90 cents.”

If your cost to acquire, serve, or retain a customer consistently exceeds what that customer brings in, you're scaling losses, not a business. 

Example: Airbus’s Voom

Shutdown: 2020
Why it failed: High operating costs, limited demand

Lesson: Corporate startups need solid margins, not just hype

Voom was an internal startup from Airbus, offering on-demand helicopter rides in cities like São Paulo and Mexico City. Aimed at busy urban commuters, the concept promised speed and convenience—but came with serious cost challenges.

• Operating helicopters was capital-intensive from day one
• The customer base was too niche to reach scale
• Each ride cost more to deliver than it returned

In March 2020, Voom shut down, officially citing the impact of COVID-19. But even before the pandemic, signs pointed to underlying financial sustainability issues—Airbus had reportedly planned to end funding. 

Avoiding unsustainable unit economics

Track your cost structure early, both fixed and variable. Make sure your pricing model supports healthy margins, not just growth. Use pilot programs to test unit economics before scaling, and rely on hard data to separate real traction from paid momentum.

Metrics like CAC-to-LTV and burn multiple can hint at product-market fit, but don’t stop there. Dig deeper:

• Is growth sustainable or driven by discounts and short-term tactics?
• Are you scaling profitably or just acquiring users at a loss?

If your venture looks like it’s working on paper but drains more resources the more it grows, it may be time to revisit its strategic relevance—not just its financial model. This is where tools like the performance × strategic fit matrix (shared in our recent Venture Club roundtable) come into play. Use them to pressure test whether the venture still fits your company’s long-term direction or if a divestment, spin-out, or shutdown is the smarter move.

‍

‍

Sign 7. Market timing and external changes

Sometimes, ventures fail not because of internal issues but because external realities have shifted unfavourably. About 10% of startup failures are attributed to "product mistimed."

External shifts (e.g. technological, regulatory, or competitive) can rapidly undermine a venture's prospects. If a giant competitor enters with vast resources, a key platform changes its policies, or regulations restrict your model, swift adaptation becomes necessary.

Example: Disney’s Metaverse Division

Shutdown: 2023

Why it failed: Market hype decline, unclear consumer adoption, cost-cutting pressures

Lesson: Trend awareness is important, but it should not guide the core venture thesis

In 2022, Disney launched a dedicated corporate startup to explore immersive storytelling and metaverse experiences. But by early 2023, the unit was shut down as part of a broader cost-cutting initiative. While financial pressure was the official reason, poor timing played a major role:

• The metaverse hype had cooled
• Investor sentiment had shifted 
• Consumer adoption remained far off

Despite Disney’s brand power and IP library, the external climate was no longer favorable to support such an ambitious, long-horizon initiative.

‍

Overcoming market timing issues and external changes

Use trends as a compass, not a business case. Start by mapping the landscape: competitors, market size, user readiness, and current pain points. That gives you a clear framework to assess whether the timing is right.

If users don’t yet feel the pain you’re solving, you’ll need to educate the market, which takes time and budget. That’s fine if you plan for it. However, launching purely because something is trending often leads to corporate venture failure when the buzz fades.

Listen to your users, stay close to the trends, and adjust your timing and messaging accordingly.

‍

Sign 8. Your company lacks a culture of “good exits”

Less of a signal and more of a structural flaw. We explored this point in depth during a recent Bundl Venture Club roundtable on "When and How to Kill Your Venture", where 15 senior corporate innovators shared how cultural dynamics often delay—or outright block—kill decisions.

Even with clear evidence and well-run experiments, many ventures continue longer than they should. Not because of poor strategy or execution—but because the organisation doesn’t allow a kill call without political risk, emotional fallout, or loss of face.

At some corporates, however, it’s different. Kill decisions are seen as signs of maturity—especially when grounded in shared assumptions and strong evidence.

‍

“If we’re aligned on what needs to be true, then whether we kill or scale, it’s a success either way.”

- Peter Roeber, Strategic Growth and Innovation Leader at Gore
‍

Corporate cultures that reward evidence-based decisions, whether they lead to scaling or shutting down, move faster, learn quicker, and burn less political capital. The best innovators? Often the ones actively trying to kill their own ideas—and failing to do so.
‍

"One of the best things we did was give the team a small budget to celebrate a kill decision—go out for lunch, reflect, recharge. It created closure and pride, not shame.”

– Iryna Smorodinova, Director of Digital Innovation at Novartis

---

When to rescue (or exit) a failing corporate venture

As mentioned earlier, corporate ventures often launch with strong brand power and vast resources. However, those same strengths can sometimes mask deeper problems. To avoid prolonged losses, you need to be brutally honest about performance and take swift, deliberate action.

1. Diagnose the root causes

A downward trajectory usually stems from more than one issue. Is it a lack of product-market fit? Leadership misalignment? Unsustainable cost structures? Get to the root and remember that superficial fixes won’t help if the core is broken.

2. Consider a strategic pivot

If the original approach is fundamentally flawed or the market has shifted, a pivot may be the best move. This could mean changing the target audience, refining the product, or rethinking the business model. Back your decision with a clear, data-driven rationale to earn internal support.

3. Know when to pull the plug

Sometimes, despite best efforts, a venture just doesn’t gain traction. When rigorous analysis, expert input, and repeated pivots still fall short, continuing to invest only deepens the loss. Shutting down can be the smartest move, freeing up resources, protecting morale, and preserving credibility.

‍

FAQs: Corporate venture failure and rescue

Q. What causes most corporate ventures to fail?

The most common causes include poor product-market fit, unsustainable unit economics, lack of stakeholder alignment, and market timing issues. Many failures stem from scaling too early or building solutions based on assumptions rather than validated customer needs.

Q. How can I tell if my corporate venture is failing?

Warning signs include flat or declining user growth, high customer churn, internal misalignment, and missed financial milestones. If traction is slow despite heavy investment, it’s time to reassess your value proposition and market fit.

Q. What’s the difference between a startup and a corporate venture?

A startup is typically an independent entity built from scratch, while a corporate venture is created or funded within a larger company. Corporate startups often have access to brand assets and distribution channels but also face internal bureaucracy and stakeholder pressure.

Q. What's the biggest difference between startup failure and corporate venture failure?

Corporate ventures often have longer runways due to parent company resources but face additional challenges with stakeholder alignment, competing priorities, and heightened expectations for returns.

Q. What are the early warning signs I should monitor daily?

Track user engagement, retention cohorts, unit economics, and team alignment metrics. Sudden changes in these indicators often precede more visible problems.

Q. How do you fix a struggling corporate venture?

Start by diagnosing the root issue—whether it’s product-market fit, cost structure, or leadership misalignment. Then, test fast, pivot strategically, and communicate progress clearly to stakeholders. If the fundamentals don’t improve, consider a strategic shutdown.

Q. How do I convince corporate stakeholders to support a strategic pivot?

Present data-backed insights on current trajectory problems, competitive benchmark analysis, and a clear milestone-based plan for the pivot with specific KPIs for measuring success.

Final thoughts: Know the signs, trust the process

Spotting these signals early is how the best innovation teams protect momentum—and reputation.

Corporate ventures don't fail overnight; they show warning signs long before collapse. The most successful innovation leaders aren't those who avoid failure entirely but those who recognise these signals early and act decisively and, counter-intuitively, embrace that killing it may be the right option after all.

When you spot these warning signs, treat them as invaluable data. They're telling you something essential about your assumptions, your execution, your market, and your own company's approach to innovation.

_____

💡 Want to learn how the best in the business save or kill their ventures? Join 300+ senior corporate entrepreneurs inside the Bundl Venture Club, where these insights, solutions, and frameworks are shared and discussed live.

‍